> Røsdal ignored the question about human code review and replied that he would appreciate feedback from someone else: ""Preferably from someone who actually works on real software development in 2026, someone with education in computer science, also considering that software development has changed with the introduction of AI llms"".
Yikes. What an asshole.
scott01 5 hours ago [-]
The response to that was just gold. An excerpt:
> I decided to run a little experiment. So I asked a frontier model developed by my employer ...
ronsor 8 hours ago [-]
"AI llms" is an awkward phrase I've never seen before.
otabdeveloper4 6 hours ago [-]
Lots of "AI influencer" jackasses pretending to be software developers and/or engineers nowadays.
wofo 11 hours ago [-]
Ugh, that's nasty. Pushing slop down the throats of Debian and Arch maintainers is _not good_.
roryirvine 11 hours ago [-]
...especially when combined with an attempt at social engineering that's so clumsy that it comes close to being outright bribery!
wofo 11 hours ago [-]
This quote from the mailing list is spectacular:
> If the Northstar browser is included in Debian Linux, I will do my utmost to make the browser successful and ensure it works well in Debian, and I will make sure that the Debian project and Debian contributors like you, and the four of you in particular, will be rewarded.
ordu 10 hours ago [-]
It looks like the author is a socially clueless person, who was touched by an AI and realized they could write a code. No experience of shipping the code or a feel for what is acceptable behavior.
If it is so, it is a good reason to not include their browser into major distros, but in any case their advice "try to maintain it for longer and get some reputation first" make my (hypothetical) psychological portrait redundant. I mean, if I'm right, they would probably lose interest and/or completely alienate distros in a year or so.
12_throw_away 6 hours ago [-]
> It looks like the author is a socially clueless person
xz-utils was 2 years ago now. It's surprising to me that people are still willing to apply any presumption of good faith and authenticity to interactions like this, especially after:
- "begging and praying" to include an unknown project in the distro
- offering what for all the world looks like an extremely clumsy bribe
- pushing a project full of contradictory and blatantly untrue claims
We don't have to - and in fact absolutely should not - evaluate projects based purely on "technical merit"! The people behind the project matter at least as much as "code quality."
And we absolutely should not be presuming good faith on the part of random people on the internet who have gotten ahold of our email addresses! Ask to see some credentials before turning your wallet over to the Wallet Inspector!
c22 2 hours ago [-]
Hey! Who are you? The credentials inspector? Now hand over that wallet...
krapp 7 hours ago [-]
Unfortunately, "try to maintain it for longer and get some reputation first" is no longer feasible. Most software written now is vibe-coded by people with little or any experience writing code, much less shipping it, nor any respect for the culture they are supplanting. Reputation no longer comes from the old guard, it comes from hype entirely within the LLM community around projects that are pushed directly to prod without so much as a glance from a human being.
Even Linus is adding LLM generated code to the Linux kernel. No one cares anymore, that world is dead.
qphe95 11 hours ago [-]
I personally think its pretty nasty how they treated this single developer, they could just reject him instead of writing a long hit piece on him.
roryirvine 8 hours ago [-]
That would be a fair reaction if the author had stopped as soon as Debian had explained to them why their behaviour was so risky. But they didn't - they went on to do the same thing to Arch.
At that point, it became hard to write it off as mere misguided enthusiasm and LWN were being entirely responsible to write it up in the way they did.
There's a pattern of behaviour on display which, though it's not entirely clear if it was intended to be malicious, does end up looking remarkably like a clumsy replay of the Jia Tan attack.
augment_me 10 hours ago [-]
How do you otherwise make an example of shit you dont want in your codebase?
There is an attention cost of pushing unverified slop onto others, public shaming and bans is a valid way to prevent this behaviour.
qphe95 10 hours ago [-]
Does this actually prevent this behavior? Does writing a hit piece somehow magically disable ai slop in the debian inbox or do certain contributors just enjoy going on an ego trip?
nkrisc 7 hours ago [-]
In what way is it a hit piece?
otabdeveloper4 6 hours ago [-]
> developer
Yes if by "developer" you mean "Claude prompt typer".
totallygeeky 7 hours ago [-]
Those security holes seem damning for a project that was assuring everyone it was ready for prime time. Flatly unacceptable for something that they're actively lobbying folks to get on board with.
Maybe less time running tokens to develop the engines and more time running security passes before running to tell the world.
netsharc 12 hours ago [-]
Ha, nice homage to the Netscape "loading" GIF: the N in the corner. When Netscape was connecting to a website and loading the page (over your dozens of kilobits per second modem), there would be shooting stars behind the N (1). Because navigators relied on the night sky, I suppose.
I've managed to pimp my Vivaldi installation to have the animated N as well: it allows custom user profile icons, and when you set it to an animated GIF, it animates as well. Add a custom CSS for the browser UI so that the profile icon is square and not circular: we're back in the 90's!
Minimalist web browsers written from scratch in C (Nordstjernen, Northstar) or Rust (Southstar).
vrganj 8 hours ago [-]
So one dude spent a bunch of tokens on not one, but three separate overambitious projects?
emilbratt 7 hours ago [-]
If I understand this correctly, Andreas Røsdal wants people to adopt first before putting in work. Thats the wrong way around.
You make a great project -> people notice and like it -> you improve -> more people notice.. and circle continues.
lysace 12 hours ago [-]
So, is the creator Norwegian, Danish or neither?
kalleboo 11 hours ago [-]
Claude is from the US
bedstefar 12 hours ago [-]
I went to figure that out. Norwegian
artifact_44 15 minutes ago [-]
[dead]
RemingtonDavies 8 hours ago [-]
[dead]
yusufcengiz 8 hours ago [-]
[flagged]
yusufcengiz 8 hours ago [-]
[flagged]
shevy-java 12 hours ago [-]
[flagged]
cinntaile 12 hours ago [-]
Why are you posting this here? This thread is not about you?
bastawhiz 11 hours ago [-]
> You can't go about "we will dethrone chrome" while you pursue "brigaders will be perma-banned".
The two things seem entirely unrelated
krapp 12 hours ago [-]
I mean, HN tells me it's trivial to one-shot any software of any complexity with AI, so I guess. And if it's open source, of course it was possible to fork it before AI came along. I never understood why HN took it as axiomatic that it was impossible to build a browser without millions of dollars of funding and an entire corporate staff, particularly when the entire core is OSS. People here are weirdly fatalistic about it.
It's obviously possible to build a browser, as it's possible to build any kind of software. We're here in a thread about a browser that someone other than Google built. Competing against Google has nothing to do with the viability of building a product to compete against Google.
Pretty damning tbh
Yikes. What an asshole.
> I decided to run a little experiment. So I asked a frontier model developed by my employer ...
> If the Northstar browser is included in Debian Linux, I will do my utmost to make the browser successful and ensure it works well in Debian, and I will make sure that the Debian project and Debian contributors like you, and the four of you in particular, will be rewarded.
If it is so, it is a good reason to not include their browser into major distros, but in any case their advice "try to maintain it for longer and get some reputation first" make my (hypothetical) psychological portrait redundant. I mean, if I'm right, they would probably lose interest and/or completely alienate distros in a year or so.
xz-utils was 2 years ago now. It's surprising to me that people are still willing to apply any presumption of good faith and authenticity to interactions like this, especially after:
- "begging and praying" to include an unknown project in the distro
- offering what for all the world looks like an extremely clumsy bribe
- pushing a project full of contradictory and blatantly untrue claims
We don't have to - and in fact absolutely should not - evaluate projects based purely on "technical merit"! The people behind the project matter at least as much as "code quality."
And we absolutely should not be presuming good faith on the part of random people on the internet who have gotten ahold of our email addresses! Ask to see some credentials before turning your wallet over to the Wallet Inspector!
Even Linus is adding LLM generated code to the Linux kernel. No one cares anymore, that world is dead.
At that point, it became hard to write it off as mere misguided enthusiasm and LWN were being entirely responsible to write it up in the way they did.
In fact, if you search HN you can see that it's been pushed repeatedly here as well: https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=github.com/nordstjern...
There's a pattern of behaviour on display which, though it's not entirely clear if it was intended to be malicious, does end up looking remarkably like a clumsy replay of the Jia Tan attack.
There is an attention cost of pushing unverified slop onto others, public shaming and bans is a valid way to prevent this behaviour.
Yes if by "developer" you mean "Claude prompt typer".
Maybe less time running tokens to develop the engines and more time running security passes before running to tell the world.
(1) https://www.reddit.com/r/nostalgia/comments/6oqzjv/the_netsc...
I've managed to pimp my Vivaldi installation to have the animated N as well: it allows custom user profile icons, and when you set it to an animated GIF, it animates as well. Add a custom CSS for the browser UI so that the profile icon is square and not circular: we're back in the 90's!
The two things seem entirely unrelated
It's obviously possible to build a browser, as it's possible to build any kind of software. We're here in a thread about a browser that someone other than Google built. Competing against Google has nothing to do with the viability of building a product to compete against Google.